One of the members of the jury in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard maligning preliminary served inappropriately, a lawyer for Heard claimed in a new documenting that requested that the court pronounce a legal blunder and request another preliminary.
“Newfound realities” show Juror No. 15 in the six-week preliminary was not the individual gathered in April to serve for the situation, Heard’s lawyer wrote in a five-page reminder recorded Friday in Virginia’s Fairfax Circuit Court.One of the members of the jury in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard slander preliminary served inappropriately, a lawyer for Heard claimed in a new documenting that requested that the court pronounce a malfeasance and request another preliminary.
“Newfound realities” show Juror No. 15 in the six-week preliminary was not the individual gathered in April to serve for the situation, Heard’s lawyer wrote in a five-page update documented Friday in Virginia’s Fairfax Circuit Court.”As the Court presumably concurs, it is profoundly upsetting for an individual not brought for jury obligation regardless to show up for jury obligation and serve on a jury, particularly for a situation like this,” the recording said.
Depp sued his ex over a December 2018 commentary Heard wrote in The Washington Post portraying herself as “a person of note addressing homegrown maltreatment.” Much of the declaration zeroed in on whether Heard had been genuinely and physically mishandled, as she guaranteed. Depp said he never hit Heard and that she was the victimizer.
After a broadcast preliminary that transformed into an exhibition, the jury found in support of Depp on every one of the three of his cases connecting with explicit proclamations in the 2018 piece.
The jury concluded Depp ought to get $10 million in compensatory harms and $5 million in reformatory harms, yet the adjudicator diminished the corrective harms grant to $350,000 under a state cap.Heard has recently said she intends to pursue the decision.
Insight about Friday’s recording was first announced by Deadline, which posted the archive on the web.
The update developed before post-preliminary movements recorded by Heard’s lawful group that requested that the appointed authority toss out the decision against her. Those movements had raised the likelihood that one of the members of the jury might not have been as expected verified by the court.
The most recent documenting said a “jury board list” for the situation incorporated an individual who might have been 77 at the hour of the preliminary. Citizen enrollment data records two people with a similar last name “evidently” dwelling at similar location, said the documenting, in which the names were redacted.
“The person who showed up for jury obligation with this name was clearly the more youthful one. Accordingly, the 52-year-old … sitting on the jury for quite a long time was never brought for jury obligation on April 11,” disregarding Heard’s fair treatment freedoms, the recording said.
The Associated Press sent messages looking for input Sunday to a delegate for Depp and two of his lawyers.